← Back to Blog 🧊 Wim's Wise Words

The Transformative Power of Cold Therapy: Insights from Uldis Udris

Adaptation Is the Point

Uldis Udris keeps returning to one word throughout this conversation, and it's the right word: adaptation. Not recovery. Not biohacking. Not performance. Adaptation. That framing matters more than it might seem.

Most cold therapy content focuses on outputs — the dopamine spike, the inflammation reduction, the fat browning. What Udris is pointing at is something more fundamental. The body's capacity to respond intelligently to environmental stress is the mechanism behind all of those outputs. You're not chasing the cold. You're training the nervous system to meet the cold with equanimity, and that same equanimity starts showing up everywhere else in life.

What the Research Confirms — and Where It Gets Interesting

The 2014 PNAS study with Wim Hof's practitioners is worth revisiting here. When researchers injected participants with E. coli endotoxin, the group practicing cyclic hyperventilation beforehand showed dramatically reduced inflammatory symptoms — not because their immune system fought harder, but because the adrenaline surge from breathing modulated the inflammatory cascade. The system stayed flexible. That's adaptation in action.

Udris is layering something onto this: movement. He's not advocating for passive cold immersion followed by passive warming. He's integrating cold with physical and breath work as a single protocol. A 2024 comprehensive review on cold therapy mechanisms in our knowledge base reinforces this — the neurophysiological response to cold is amplified when combined with controlled breathing. The sympathetic activation from cold plus the parasympathetic recovery from breath work creates a more complete oscillation than either alone.

The cold doesn't build resilience. Your response to the cold does. That distinction is worth sitting with.
— Wim

Where Practitioners Diverge

Udris is thoughtful about something that most cold therapy content glosses over: no one's physiology is identical. "No one is like me," he says, and that's not modesty — it's precision. The research generally supports this. Individual variation in cold shock response, brown adipose tissue density, and autonomic nervous system baseline all affect what an optimal protocol looks like for a given person. What's 3 minutes for one person is 6 minutes for another. What's therapeutic immersion for someone with robust adrenal function might be excessive stress for someone running on fumes.

The group session format he uses — up to 40 people — is an interesting solution to this. Shared experience creates peer calibration. You see someone handle it well and you recalibrate your own sense of what's possible. The community effect isn't just motivational. It's informational.

My Practical Recommendation

If you're starting out, don't optimize for cold first. Optimize for breath. A solid diaphragmatic breathing practice before you enter the cold changes the entire experience — it pre-activates the nervous system's regulatory capacity so the cold shock doesn't overwhelm it. Start with 2-3 minutes at a temperature that feels challenging but not panicked. Add movement afterward. Don't just stand in warm air waiting to recover — walk, stretch, engage the body. You're completing a circuit, not waiting for it to end.

The Surprising Connection

Seven years of practice, group sessions up to 40 people, clients breaking through mental limitations they didn't know they had. What Udris has built is essentially a laboratory for confronting the mind's first function: identifying limitation. And what cold does — reliably, repeatedly — is reveal that the limit was set earlier than reality required. That's not a wellness benefit. That's a worldview shift. And it's probably why people keep coming back.